Richmond C. Amadi is an independent journalist, Book Publisher, member of RSU Alumni, Researcher (currently researching with Researchgate.net), Writer, Motivational Speaker. He is a BSc Holder in Office and Information Management, and Diploma holder in Management all from Rivers State University. Currently doing his MSc with RSU. Contact him on Richmond.email@example.com or Amadirichmondc@gmail.com All Social Platforms: @amadirichmondc
59Th WITNESS: Atiku’s ‘expert witness’ set to testify on server saga
The Peoples Democratic Party and its presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, on Friday called an ‘expert witness’, David Njoga, as its 59th petitioners’ witness to testify before the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal on issues relating to the usage or not of server and electronic transmission of results during the February 23, 2019 presidential poll.
Atiku and his party are challenging the victory of President Muhammadu Buhari and his All Progressives Congress at the poll.
Before calling the witness, the petitioners had through their lawyer, Chief Chris Uche (SAN), tendered as exhibits some documents relating to the testimony of the witness.
Some of the documents tendered were titled, ‘Expert Report of INEC’s Information System as revealed by the whistle-blower’s site’, admitted as Exhibit P87; and ‘Download from the website, www.factsdontlie.com’.
The certificate of compliance accompanying the documents were also admitted as Exhibit P89.
Another document titled as ‘Executive summary of 11 states under review’ was admitted as Exhibit P90.
The respondents’ lawyers comprising, Yunus Usman (SAN), for the Independent National Electoral Commission; Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), for Buhari and Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) for the All Progressives Congress, reserved their objections to the admissibility of the documents.
After the tendering of the documents the petitioners’ lawyer, Uche, called Njoga, whom he described as an expert witness brought to court on a subpoena.
Uche tendered the subpoena as an exhibit and it was admitted by the court.
Only Buhari’s lawyer, Olanipekun, objected to the admissibility of the subpoena, but all the respondents’ lawyers objected to calling of the witness but reserved their reasons till the final address stage.